Linking Poverty And Educational Achievement
Tuesday, October 12, 2010(Metropolitan Washington Council, AFL-CIO)
“The IMPACT model for evaluating teacher performance is very
numerically based,” says Washington Post columnist Courtland Milloy in a
recent interview with journalist and social activist Pete Tucker. “It fails to
recognize the artistry involved in teaching which cannot be captured on some
statistical test,” he said. In the interview, Milloy questioned whether some
of the recent gains in school reform and student achievement are the result of
gentrification. “The city lost 12,000 affordable homes and apartments last
year. Somehow 4000 students have just disappeared out of the school system. And
in those schools, where most of these students came from, if they were poor,
yeah, test scores did do a little blip up, as you would expect when you lose
poor people out of the system. That doesn’t mean that you’re educating them.
It means that they’re just not there to bring your test scores down.” Tucker
argues that, unlike Fenty, Rhee and the Post, Milloy has insisted on linking
poverty and educational achievement. “No matter how great a teacher may be,
there’s no way you can educate a child who is not in class,” says Milloy.
“It’s pretty hard to get a girl to perform well on a test if she’s keeping
some painful secret about being pregnant or abused, for example.” Click
here to listen to the full interview on Tucker’s website, The Fight
Back. – photo: thousands of area students, community
supporters and union members rallied at Freedom Plaza to demand respect for
District teachers in October, 2009; photo by Adam Wright